I had to shut my eyes in order to hear the music, however fascinating it was to watch the ever-changing movement on the screen. I will add that the visuals were abstract uses of colour. What difference would it have made if the visuals were, at least in part, representational? Would the experience have been less overwhelming if there was less movement and change?
The venue where my art will be paired with music is not as visually distracting as the ornate church. Does that give me a broader range for what I make?
The 'Scenes' are short. It takes about 17 minutes to play 13 pieces. I have pretty much decided that I will make 13 smallish pieces rather than one big one. That means that the audience will have a minute, give-or-take a few seconds, to look at/study each projected piece. If I were to make little progressive 'movies' as I create each piece, would that be distracting rather than enhancing of the performance? How much can a person process in a minute?
I have found piano concerts -- particularly in bland, semi-dark rooms -- productive for my visual imagination. This opportunity is a welcome excuse to delve into that visually responsive place. I have been playing with ideas for some weeks now. I am feeling on the cusp of making commitments to some of those ideas and springing into action.
No comments:
Post a Comment